| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 比较新生儿泪囊炎分别应用加压泪道冲洗法与泪道探通术治疗的临床效果。方法 选取2015-02～2016-04就诊的新生儿泪囊炎患儿50例（64眼）为研究对象，经随机数字表法分为A组25例（31眼）行泪道探通术治疗，B组25例（33眼）行加压泪道冲洗法治疗，观察两组患儿治疗效果、并发症发生情况及患儿家长满意度。结果 A组患儿治愈率为93.55%，高于B组的72.73%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组患儿并发症发生率为4.00%，低于B组的24.00%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组患儿家长满意率为96.00%，高于B组的72.00%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 在新生儿泪囊炎治疗中，泪道探通术效果优于加压泪道冲洗法，且前者能有效降低并发症发生风险，安全性及患儿家长满意率更高，更值得推广。 |
| 关键词: 新生儿泪囊炎 泪道探通术 加压泪道冲洗 并发症 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.10.06 |
| 分类号:R 722 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Comparison of the clinical value of pressurized lacrimal irrigation and probing of lacrimal passages in the treatment of neonatal dacryocystitis |
|
LIN Hai-bo, LI Wen-lin, ZHUO Xiao
|
|
Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital of Longhua New District of Shenzhen City, Guangdong 518110, China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To study the clinical value of application of pressurized lacrimal irrigation and probing of lacrimal passages in the treatment of neonatal dacryocystitis.Methods 50 children with neonatal dacryocystitis(64 eyes) were selected as the research subjects from February 2015 to April 2016 and were randomly divided into group A(n=25, 31 eyes) and group B(n=25, 33 eyes). The patients in group A were treated with probing of lacrimal passages therapy while those in group B were treated with pressurized lacrimal irrigation. The curative effect, complications and satisfaction rate of children′s parents were compared between the two groups.Results The cure rate of group A(93.55%) was significantly higher than that of group B(P<0.05). The incidence of complications in group A(4%) was significantly lower than that in group B(P<0.05). The satisfaction rate in group A(96%) was significantly higher than that in group B(72%)(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of probing of lacrimal passages is better than that of pressurized lacrimal irrigation in the treatment of neonatal dacryocystitis. |
| Key words: Neonatal dacryocystitis Probing of lacrimal passages Pressurized lacrimal irrigation Complications |
