| 摘要: |
| 【】目的：探讨应用MRC肌功能矫治器对口腔不良习惯并伴有错牙合畸形患儿的矫治效果。方法：按就诊单双日随机设置试验组(13例)与对照组(12例),试验组：选择合适的软质MRC肌功能矫治器(以Infant型为主)对患儿进行矫治；对照组：根据不同类型的口腔不良习惯及临床表现使用舌刺、四角簧、腭栏、前庭盾等传统的功能性矫治器对随机选择的患儿进行矫治。两组治疗过程中及结束后,随访填写问卷调查表(包括患儿及家长对矫治器佩戴的舒适度、矫治效果主观评价等)。统计学方法：采用SPSS 22.0统计软件进行统计学分析,采用确切概率法比较两组矫治口腔不良习惯效果；同时比较两组家长对矫治器佩戴的舒适度、矫治效果主观评价问卷调查结果,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果：经确切概率法分析,P = 0.411,两组差异无统计学意义,但试验组的成功率(76.9%)较对照组(58.3%)高。两组分别于第1周、1个月、3个月、6个月及结束后问卷调查无论是舒适度还是矫治效果主观评价差异均无统计学意义,P = 1.000。 |
| 关键词: 肌功能矫治器 儿童口腔不良习惯 矫治效果 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Clinical study on the treatment of children's oral bad habits by the MRC muscle function corrector |
|
施春梅
|
|
People's hospital of guangxi zhuang autonomous region
|
| Abstract: |
| Objective: To investigate the effect of the use of MRC muscle function on the treatment of oral bad habits and the treatment of children with malformed teeth. Methods: the test group (13 cases) and the control group (12 cases) were set up according to random. Test group: Soft MRC muscle function orthopeters (mainly the Infant type) treated the children; Control group: According to different types of oral bad habits and clinical manifestations, the traditional functional corrector, such as tongue thorn, quadrangle spring, palatal column and vestibular shield, were used to treat children. During and after the two groups of treatment, the questionnaire (including the children and parents" comfort level and subjective evaluation of the correction effect) were completed. Statistical methods: SPSS 22 was adopted. Statistical software was used for statistical analysis, and the exact probability method was used to compare the effects of the two groups on the treatment of bad oral habits. At the same time, the results of subjective evaluation of the comfort and correction effect of the two groups were compared with P< 0.05, which was statistically significant. Results: the difference of P = 0.411 was not statistically significant between two groups, but the success rate of the test group (76.9%) was higher than that of the control group (58.3%). In the first week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and the end of the questionnaire, the subjective evaluation of both comfort and correction was not statistically significant, P = 1.000. Conclusion: Although the success rate of MRC in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Although this may be related to the small sample size, it is not obvious that the advantage of the correction of the malfunctions of the MRC is not obvious. It will be a hot topic in the future for the treatment of children"s oral bad habit. |
| Key words: MRC muscle function children oral bad habits the effection of correct. |
