引用本文:张金立,黄 钧,刘晓春,何 毅,周向阳.酶联免疫吸附测定法检测ζ珠蛋白链在广西东南亚缺失型α-地中海贫血筛查中的应用价值[J].中国临床新医学,2009,2(12):1276-1278.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1277次   下载 1098 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
酶联免疫吸附测定法检测ζ珠蛋白链在广西东南亚缺失型α-地中海贫血筛查中的应用价值
张金立,黄 钧,刘晓春,何 毅,周向阳
530021 南宁,广西壮族自治区临床检验中心
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 评价并比较酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测ζ珠蛋白链与聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法在诊断广西东南亚缺失型α-地中海贫血中的临床诊断价值。方法 收集广西壮族自治区人民医院门诊部和产科住院病例210份血样标本(其中115例为正常对照;95例均有MCV<80 fl、MCH<27 pg,Hb在25~128 g/L之间),采用ELISA法和聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法进行检测, 最后对ELISA法筛查--SEA携带者总的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阴性预测值、阳性预测值与聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法进行分析并比较其诊断--SEA携带者的临床应用价值。结果 ELISA法诊断--SEA携带者总的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别是96.2%、98.3%、97.6%和98.3%、96.2%, 而聚合酶链反应(PCR)法检测的相应指标均为100.0%(P>0.01),两者无显著性差异。ELISA法不但对--SEA携带者有很高的检出率, 而且还能检出个别-α/αα的病例, 但其不能筛查出β-地中海贫血,对脐带血的检出率低(仅为65.0%)。结论 ELISA法能非常有效地检出--SEA携带者,加之该法简便快速、技术要求不高且经济实用,故很适用于常规实验室和大样本的人群筛查。
关键词:  α-地中海贫血  酶联免疫吸附试验  聚合酶链反应
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2009.12.18
分类号:R 566.6
基金项目:
Application value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) for zeta-globin chains in screening of α-thalassemia Southeast Asian deletion in Guangxi
ZHANG Jin-li, HUANG Jun, LIU Xiao-chun, et al.
Guangxi Center for Clinical Laboratory, Nanning 530021, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical diagnosis value between an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) for embryonic zeta-globin chains and polymerase chain reaction(PCR) method as a routine screening test for(--SEA)α-thalassemia in clinical laboratory. Methods Two hundred and ten blood samples(115 cases normal; 95 cases MCV<80 fl、MCH<27 pg, Hb 25~128 g/L)from consecutive outpatient and obstetrical inpatients in The People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region with a request for hemoglobin (Hb) analysis were screened simultaneously for α-thalassemia determinants by ELISA and PCR respectively.Results There were very significant higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and negative predictive values as well as positive predictive values of ELISA method(96.2%, 98.3%, 97.6%, 98.3% and 96.2%, respectively) like PCR (100%, 100%, 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively) for screening for --SEA carrier(all P>0.01).The ELISA method was capable of detecting effectively only the cases with -α/αα. But it had a low positive rate in neonatal cord blood (only 65%).Conclusion The ELISA method is a highly sensitive and specific and reliable test for -α/αα and is more effective, The ELISA method is simple to perform, rapid, and applicable to large-scale or population-based screening programs and to a routine diagnostic laboratory.
Key words:  α-Thalassemia  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay  Polymerase chain reaction