引用本文:赖铭春.人工股骨头置换与人工全髋关节置换在治疗老年股骨颈骨折中的疗效比较[J].中国临床新医学,2010,3(1):41-43.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1296次   下载 1255 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
人工股骨头置换与人工全髋关节置换在治疗老年股骨颈骨折中的疗效比较
赖铭春
536000 广西,北海市第二人民医院
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 对比观察人工股骨头置换(FHR)与人工全髋关节置换(THR)在治疗老年股骨颈骨折中的临床疗效。方法 将42例股骨颈骨折随机分为两组,分别采用人工股骨头置换和人工全髋关节置换术进行治疗。结果 两组患者的手术时间、出血量和术后并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。人工股骨头置换和人工全髋关节置换术后优良率分别为90.9%、95.0%(P>0.05)。结论 人工股骨头置换和人工全髋关节置换术同样可以达到治愈股骨颈骨折的目的,是目前治疗老年股骨颈骨折比较理想而可靠的方法。
关键词:  股骨颈骨折  人工股骨头置换  人工全髋关节置换术  疗效比较
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2010.01.15
分类号:R 683.42
基金项目:
The comparison of efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement and the artificial total hip replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fracture
LAI Ming-chun
Beihai Second People′ s Hospital,Guangxi 536000,China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To compared the clinical efficacy of artificial femoral head replacement (FHR) and artificial total hip replacement (THR) in the treatment femoral neck fractures.Methods The 42 cases of femoral neck fractures randomly divided into two groups to use artificial FHR and artificial THR for replacement surgery for treatment.Results The operative time,the incidence of post operative complications and the amount of blood between two groups were not significant difference (P>0.05).The excellent and good rate of FHR and THR were 90.9%, 95.0% respectively (P>0.05).Conclusion Artificial FHR and the artificial THR can cure femoral neck fractures and are the ideal and reliable methods for treating femoral neck fractures.
Key words:  Femoral neck fracture  Artificial femoral head replacement  Artificial total hip replacement surgery  Comparison of efficacy