引用本文:麦泉云,曾 宇,杨新疆.急性心肌梗死患者不同接诊方法的预后比较分析[J].中国临床新医学,2012,5(8):768-770.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1284次   下载 1016 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
急性心肌梗死患者不同接诊方法的预后比较分析
麦泉云,曾 宇,杨新疆
535000 广西,钦州市第二人民医院急诊科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者不同接诊方法与预后之间的相互关系,旨在提高AMI抢救成功率。方法 对该院急诊科2000~2010年出诊院前急救的AMI患者132例(观察组)和同期由家属或同事送来急诊救治的AMI患者136例(对照组)作回顾性对比分析。结果 观察组病死率为12.12%,低于对照组的22.79%(χ2=3.89,P<0.05)。结论 不同接诊方法对AMI患者预后有差别,院前急救能降低AMI患者病死率。
关键词:  急性心肌梗死  接诊方法  院前急救  病死率
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2012.08.26
分类号:R 542.2+1
基金项目:
Prognostic comparison of different reception methods in the patients with acute myocardial infarction
MAI Quan-yun, ZENG Yu, YANG Xin-jiang
Department of Emergency, the Second People′s Hospital of Qinzhou City, Guangxi 535000, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To explore the relation between different reception methods and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) to improve the successful rate of rescue of AMI.Methods One hundred and thirty-two patients with AMI receiving pre-hospital care of the emergency department of our hospital from 2000~2010 were used as observation group and during the same time 136 patients with AMI who were sent to hospital by family members or colleagues for rescue were used as the control group. Their clinical data were retrospectively compared and analyzed.Results The mortality rate (12.12%) of the observation group was lower than that (22.79%) of control group (χ2=3.89,P<0.05).Conclusion The influence of different reception methods on the prognosis of AMI is different, and pre-hospital care can reduce mortality of AMI.
Key words:  Acute myocardial infarction(AMI)  Reception method  Pre-hospital care  Mortality rate