引用本文:傅 国.粘合术与缝合术对皮肤裂伤的疗效对比观察[J].中国临床新医学,2012,5(9):834-836.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1390次   下载 1180 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
粘合术与缝合术对皮肤裂伤的疗效对比观察
傅 国
528200 佛山,广东省中西医结合医院外科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 探讨皮肤裂伤伤口处理的理想方法。方法 2009-07~2011-07将140例皮肤裂伤患者随机分为实验组(70例)和对照组(70例),实验组施行清创粘合术,对照组施行清创缝合术。术后第1、3、7天对伤口愈合情况及愈后外观满意程度进行对比观察。结果 两组患者伤口愈合情况比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而实验组的愈合外观满意程度优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论 清创粘合术治疗皮肤裂伤的手术时间短,术后伤口愈合,尤其是患者满意度方面效果较好。合理应用清创粘合术是治疗皮肤裂伤,改善伤口愈合外观的良好方法。
关键词:  皮肤裂伤  清创缝合术  医用胶  清创粘合术
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2012.09.10
分类号:R 61
基金项目:
Contrast of therapeutic effects between adhesive and suture in the treatment of skin lacerations
FU Guo
Department of General Surgery, the Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Guangdong, Foshan 528200, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To find an ideal method in the treatment of skin lacerations.Methods One hundred and forty patients with skin laceration were randomly divided into two groups, with 70 patients in each group. The control group was treated by traditional debridement and suture, and the experimental group was treated by adhesive and debridement. The situation of wound healing and satisfactory degree of postoperative cosmetic appearance were followed up 1, 2, and 7 days after the treatment.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the situation of wound healing between two groups(P>0.05); but the satisfactory degree of postoperative cosmetic appearance in the experimental group was better than that in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusion Compared with debridment and suture, debridement and adhesive is a better treatment for the wound of skin laceration, which saves the time and improves the patients′ satisfactory degree.
Key words:  Skin lacerations  Medical adhesive  Debridement and adhesive  Debridement and suture