引用本文:蓝海霞,包华宇,颜良英,曾广萍,陈进文.前列腺汽化电切术后三种方法牵引气囊导尿管的对比研究[J].中国临床新医学,2012,5(11):1069-1071.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1340次   下载 1163 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
前列腺汽化电切术后三种方法牵引气囊导尿管的对比研究
蓝海霞,包华宇,颜良英,曾广萍,陈进文
535000 广西,钦州市第二人民医院泌尿外科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 比较分析经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TUVP)后三种牵引固定气囊导尿管方法的效果。方法 选择210例TUVP术后患者,随机分为甲、乙、丙三组,每组70例,甲组采用橡皮筋法牵引固定气囊导尿管,乙组采用大腿内侧胶布固定法,丙组采用纱布结法,比较三种方法对术后患者的情绪评估、疼痛评估、牵拉后止血效果评估、拔管时间、相关并发症(如尿道外口坏死、狭窄、下肢静脉血栓、压疮)等多种参数的影响。结果 橡皮筋法在术后情绪评估、疼痛评估、牵拉后止血效果评估、拔管时间上优于大腿内侧胶布固定法和纱布结法(P<0.05);并发症中尿道外口坏死、狭窄及压疮(压红)三组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),下肢静脉血栓比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 橡皮筋牵引法具有舒适度好、止血快、拔管早、并发症少的优点,可作为TUVP术后牵引固定气囊导尿管的首选方法。
关键词:  经尿道前列腺汽化电切术  气囊导尿管  橡皮筋法  大腿内侧胶布固定法  纱布结法
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2012.11.26
分类号:R 472
基金项目:广西钦州市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(编号:20111405)
Comparative study of three methods of traction and fixation balloon catheter after transurethral vapo-resection of prostate
LAN Hai-xia,BAO Hua-yu,YAN Liang-ying, et al.
Department of Urology,the Second People′s Hospital of Qinzhou,Guangxi 535000,China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To compare the efficacy of the three methods of traction and fixation balloon catheter after transurethral vapo-resection of prostate (TUVP).Methods Two hundred and ten patients were randomly divided into A, B, C three groups after TUVP and control group in equal number (n=70), Group A used the rubber band traction and fixation of balloon catheter, Group B used inner thigh tape fixation method, Group C used gauze knot method, and then compared the three methods after operation, including emotional assessment, pain assessment, traction hemostatic effect assessment, extubation time, complications (such as external urethral necrosis, narrow, deep vein thrombosis, pressure sores).Results Rubber band method was superior to the inner thigh tape fixation and gauze knot in emotional assessment, pain assessment, traction after the hemostatic effect of assessment, time to extubation (P<0.05); There was significant difference in comparing the external urethral necrosis, narrow and pressure sores(pressure red)(P<0.05), there was not significant difference in comparing deep vein thrombosis.Conclusion Rubber band traction method has the advantages of comfort, hemostasis, early extubation, fewer complications and can be used as the preferred method of traction and fixation balloon catheter after TUVP.
Key words:  Transurethral vapo-resection of prostate  Balloon catheter  Rubber band method  Inner thigh tape fixation method  Gauze knot method