摘要: |
[摘要] 目的 观察米索前列醇不同给药途径终止早期妊娠的临床效果。方法 选择到该院门诊自愿要求药物流产终止妊娠的早期妊娠妇女146例,按就诊次序分成A、B两组,各73例。A组米索前列醇口服给药,B组米索前列醇阴道给药。观察两种给药途径的流产效果。结果 A组完全流产率为91.8%,B组完全流产率为97.3%,两组流产效果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 早期药物流产方案中,以米索前列醇阴道给药优于口服给药。 |
关键词: 药物流产 米索前列醇 给药途径 |
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2013.03.18 |
分类号:R 711 |
基金项目: |
|
Effect comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol in the terminatiom of the early pregnancy |
SU Ze-ying
|
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine of Wuzhou, Guangxi 543002,China
|
Abstract: |
[Abstract] Objective To compare the differences of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme.Methods One hundred and forty-six early pregnancy women who demanded drug abortion were randomly divided into group A and group B(each group=73).The abortion effects of two misoprostol’s route of administration in the early drug abortion scheme were abserved,including the oral administration(A gruop) and the vagina’administration(B group).Results The rate of abortion of A group was 91.8% while that of B group was 97.3%. There was significant difference in the abortion rate between two groups (P<0.05).Conclusion In the early drug abortion scheme,misoprostol’s vagina administration has better effect than oral administration. |
Key words: Drug abortion Misoprostol Route of administration |