摘要: |
[摘要] 目的 比较研究视感知疗法在学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视中使用压抑与遮盖法的疗效。方法 将78例(155眼)学龄期儿童屈光参差性弱视患者,分别行压抑(43例,85眼)和遮盖(35例,70眼)法矫正视力较好眼,使用视感知疗法治疗1年后应用统计学分析疗效。结果 压抑法的疗效优于遮盖法(P<0.05),总有效率也高于遮盖法(P<0.05),在轻、中度弱视患者中,压抑法的疗效均优于遮盖法(P<0.05),而在重度患者中,两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 在采用视感知疗法治疗学龄儿童屈光参差性弱视患者中,压抑法矫正视力的效果比遮盖法要好。 |
关键词: 压抑 遮盖 屈光参差性弱视 视知觉学习 |
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2013.11.02 |
分类号:R 77 |
基金项目:广西自然科学基金资助项目(编号:2010GXNSFB013082);广西卫生厅科研课题(编号:Z2011523) |
|
Comparison of the effect between penalization and occlusion in the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia |
KONG Min,LIN Quan,ZHAO Wu-xiao,et al.
|
Department of Visual Science and Optometry Center,the People′s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, China
|
Abstract: |
[Abstract] Objective To compare the effect between penalization and occlusion in the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia.Methods In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia,85 eyes of 43 patients received the penalization(penalization group) and 70 eyes of 35 patients received the occlusion(occlusion group).After 1 year researching was analyzed.Results The effects of the penalization group were better than the occlusion′s,the effects in both slight and moderate amblyopia of the penalization group also better than occlusion′s,their difference had the statistical significance(P<0.05),but in the severe amblyopia,the difference of the effect between two groups had no statistical significance(P>0.05).Conclusion In the perceptual learning for treatment of school-age children with anisometropic amblyopia,using the penalization may have higher total effect than using the occlusion. |
Key words: Penalization Occlusion Anisometropic amblyopia Perceptual learning |