引用本文:王 贺,邢智远,孙风波,张新明,成 枫,亓玉琴.替诺福韦与恩替卡韦对高病毒载量HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效比较[J].中国临床新医学,2016,9(10):882-884.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1847次   下载 1846 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
替诺福韦与恩替卡韦对高病毒载量HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效比较
王 贺,邢智远,孙风波,张新明,成 枫,亓玉琴
266000 山东,青岛市第六人民医院肝病科(王 贺);266000 山东,青岛市中心医院普外科(邢智远);266000 山东,青岛市海慈医疗集团普外科(孙风波,张新明);266000 山东,青岛市中心血站检验科(成 枫);266033 山东,青岛市市立医院消化内科(亓玉琴)
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 观察高病毒载量HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者应用替诺福韦(TDF)和恩替卡韦(ETV)治疗48周的临床疗效和安全性。方法 选取该院收治的高病毒载量HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者80例,随机分成两组,每组40例。TDF组应用TDF,300 mg顿服,1次/d;ETV组应用ETV 0.5 mg顿服,1次/d。观察治疗4、12、24、48周时HBV-DNA转阴率、HBeAg转阴率、ALT水平等。结果 TDF组治疗4、12、24和48周时HBV-DNA转阴率分别是62.5%、77.5%、95.0%、100%,ETV组分别是25.0%、55.0%、72.5%、95.0%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗4、12周时HBeAg转阴率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TDF组治疗24、48周时HBeAg转阴率(65.0%、77.5%)高于ETV组(37.5%、50.0%),P<0.05。两组在ALT复常率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 TDF治疗高病毒载量HBeAg阳性CHB疗效较ETV好,值得临床推广应用。
关键词:  替诺福韦  恩替卡韦  高病毒载量  HBeAg阳性  慢性乙型肝炎
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2016.10.11
分类号:R 575.1
基金项目:
Comparison of the clinical efficacy between tenofovir and entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B E antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B with high viral load
WANG He, XING Zhi-yuan, SUN Feng-bo, et al.
Department of Liver Disease, the Sixth People′s Hospital of Qingdao City, Shandong 266000, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of tenofovir(TDF) and entecavir(ETV) on the treatment of hepatitis B E antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B(CHB) with high viral load.Methods Eighty patients with hepatitis B E antigen-positive CHB and high viral load were collected in our hospital and were randomly divided into two groups. TDF group was treated with tenofovir, 300 mg po qd; the ETV group was treated with entecavir, 0.5 mg po qd. HBV-DNA negative conversion rate, HBeAg negative conversion rate and ALT levels were observed 4,12, 24 and 48 weeks after the treatment.Results The HBV-DNA negative conversion rates in the TDF group(62.5%, 77.5%, 95.0%, 100%) were significantly higher than those in the ETV group(25.0%, 55.0%, 72.5%, 95.0%) 4 , 12, 24 and 48 weeks after the treatment(P<0.05). There were no significant differences in HBeAg negative conversion rates between the two groups 4 and 12 weeks after the treatment(P>0.05), however, HBeAg negative conversion rates of the TDF group were significantly higher than those of the ETV group 24 and 48 weeks after the treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the ALT normalization rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion TDF is more effective than ETV in the treatment of high viral load HBeAg positive CHB
Key words:  Tenofovir(TDF)  Entecavir(ETV)  High viral load  Hepatitis B E antigen-positive  Chronic hepatitis B(CHB)