| 摘要: |
| ［摘要］ 目的 比较隧道式拖线术与多切口挂线引流术治疗高位后马蹄型肛周脓肿的临床疗效。方法 将该院2014-12～2015-12收治的高位后马蹄型肛周脓肿患者88例，根据手术方式不同分为对照组和观察组各44例。对照组应用多切口挂线引流术，观察组应用隧道式拖线术。比较两组手术疗效、术后恢复时间及肛门恢复情况。结果 两组手术疗效相近，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；观察组术后恢复时间明显短于对照组，肛门恢复情况明显优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 隧道式拖线术是治疗高位后马蹄型肛周脓肿安全、有效的术式，能够明显改善患者肛门功能，值得推广。 |
| 关键词: 隧道式拖线术 多切口挂线引流术 高位后马蹄型肛周脓肿 |
| DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2018.03.22 |
| 分类号:R 65 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Comparison of the effect of tunnel thread drawing and multi-incision thread drawing drainage on treatment of high horseshoe anal abscess |
|
YANG You-zhi
|
|
Department of General Surgery, the People′s Hospital of Yucheng County, Henan 476300, China
|
| Abstract: |
| ［Abstract］ Objective To compare the clinical effect of tunnel thread drawing and multi-incision thread drawing drainage on the treatment of high horseshoe anal abscess.Methods From December 2014 to December 2015, 88 patients with high horseshoe anal abscess were divided into two groups according to different surgical methods, with 44 cases in each group. The control group was treated with multi-incision thread drawing drainage, while the observation group was treated with tunnel type wire drawing. The operative effect, postoperative recovery time and anal recovery were compared between the two groups.Results There was no signficant difference in the operative effect between the two groups(P>0.05). The postoperative recovery time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group and the anal function of the observation group improved better than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The tunnel thread drawing technique is a safe and effective method for the treatment of high horseshoe anal abscess. |
| Key words: Tunnel thread drawing Multi-incision thread drawing drainage High horseshoe anal abscess |
