引用本文:李文媚,张 曙,石海燕.琥珀酰明胶和羟乙基淀粉血液稀释对肿瘤患者血清电解质和血浆组胺的影响[J].中国临床新医学,2009,2(4):336-339.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1328次   下载 1334 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
琥珀酰明胶和羟乙基淀粉血液稀释对肿瘤患者血清电解质和血浆组胺的影响
李文媚,张 曙,石海燕
523018 广东,东莞市人民医院麻醉科
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 观察4%琥珀酰明胶(succinylated gelatin)和6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4 (hydroxyethyl starch,6%HES 130 /0.4)行急性高容量血液稀释(acute hypervolemic hemodilution, AHH)对患者血清电解质及血浆组胺的影响。方法 选择食管癌、结肠癌择期手术60例,随机分为G、H两组(n=30),G组输注琥珀酰明胶15 ml/kg;H组输注6%HES 130 /0.4 15 ml/kg。两组患者麻醉诱导后10 min开始行AHH,分别在AHH前(T0),开始AHH后5 min(T1),开始AHH后30 min(T2),完成AHH后30 min(T3),完成AHH后1 h(T4),完成AHH后3 h(T5)分别采集静脉血,检测红细胞比容(Hct)和血清电解质Na+、K+、Ca+、Cl-的变化及血浆组胺的变化。结果 (1)血清电解质的变化:组间比较 Na+、K+、Ca+、Cl-值在各时间点两组间比较差异无统计学意义;组内比较 G、H两组Na+、Cl-、K+、Ca+值在T1 ~T5时间点与T0时间点比较差异有统计学意义。(2)血浆组胺的变化:组间比较各时间点组胺值G、H两组比较差异无统计学意义;组内比较,组胺值与T0比较其余各时间点差异有统计学意义。结论 用琥珀酰明胶和羟乙基淀粉实施轻度AHH时对血清电解质有一定的影响,但没有明显临床症状,仍可安全应用;两组均可引起血浆组胺轻度升高,但在正常值范围,不引起临床症状。
关键词:  琥珀酰明胶  羟乙基淀粉  急性高容量血液稀释  组胺
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2009.04.005
分类号:
基金项目:东莞市科技局医疗卫生项目(编号:B200416)
The effect of hemodilution with succinylated gelatin and 6%HES 130/0.4 on serum electrolytes and plasma histamine in cancer patients
LI Wen-mei, ZHANG Shu, SHI Hai-yan
Department of Anesthesiology,the People′s Hospital of Donguan, Dongguan 523018, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective  To investigate the effect of acute hypervolemic hemodilution (AHH) with Gelofusine and 6%HES130/0.4 on serum with electrolytes and plasma histamine of cancer patients.Methods  Sixty cancer patients of elective surgery esophageal cancer or colon cancer were randomly divided into two groups with 30 in each group. Group G received infusion of succinylated gelatin 15ml/kg; Group H received infusion of 6% HES 130/0.4 15 ml /kg. After induced anesthesia for 10 minutes, AHH were started in tow groups, venous blood samples before AHH (T0), 5min after beginnig AHH (T1), 30 min after beginnig AHH (T2), 30 min after finishing AHH (T3), 1hour after finishing AHH (T4), 3 hours after finishing AHH (T5)were collected for determining Hct, serum electrolyte Na+, K+, Ca+, Cl- and plasma histamine. Results (1)In inter-group comparision on serum electrolyte: at T0 to T5 there were not significant differences between group G and H. In intra-group comparision there was rise trend of Na+ and Cl-. In intra-group comparision on serum electrolyte, at T0 and T1 to T5 there were significantly differences compareed with that at T0 in two groups(P<0.05), and K+ and Ca+ decrease significantly(P<0.05). (2)In inter-group comparision on histamine: at T0 to T5 there were not significant differences between group G and H. In intra-group comparision on histamine: in group G and H, the histamine at T1 to T5 were significantly higher than that at T0(P<0.05). Conclusion  Succinylated gelatin and hydroxyethyl starch in the implementation of mild AHH, have a certain influence upon serum electrolyte, however, no clinical symptoms, plasma histamine can slightly increased, but still within the normal range, do not cause symptoms.So they are safe in application of AHH.
Key words:  Succinylated gelatin  Hydroxyethyl starch  Acute hypervolemic hemodilution  Histamine