引用本文:陈兴智,英健民,韦海春,梁玉君,孔庆方,黄伟文.医务人员输血知识掌握情况调查[J].中国临床新医学,2014,7(6):504-507.
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1326次   下载 980 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
医务人员输血知识掌握情况调查
陈兴智,英健民,韦海春,梁玉君,孔庆方,黄伟文
545005 柳州,广西血液中心(陈兴智,孔庆方);505001 广西,柳州市卫生局(英健民);545001 广西,柳州市妇幼保健院输血科(韦海春);545005 广西,柳州市工人医院输血科(梁玉君);545007 广西,柳铁中心医院输血科(黄伟文)
摘要:
[摘要] 目的 了解辖区医院医务人员输血相关知识的掌握情况。方法 利用自行设计的问卷,对用血医院651名医务人员分别在输血质量管理及输血资质评审辅导前后进行调查,并对不同级别医院的护理、医师人员各考核项目得分情况进行统计分析。结果 输血质量管理及输血资质评审辅导前2、3级医院护理人员综合得分分别为(29.56±4.47)分和(30.72±4.19)分,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2、3级医院医师综合得分分别为(28.87±3.98)分和(31.63±3.77)分,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。评审辅导后2、3级医院护理人员综合得分分别为(39.19±1.20)分和(38.40±1.54)分,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),2、3级医院护理人员得分情况较评审辅导前提高(P<0.01),且2级医院护理人员比3级医院护理人员提高得更明显;2、3级医院医师经评审辅导后综合得分分别为(38.90±2.17)分和(38.71±1.35)分,均较评审辅导前显著提高(P<0.01),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 2、3级医院经评审辅导培训后,医务人员输血知识掌握情况得分明显提高,不同级别医院的医务人员均可通过学习掌握更多的输血相关知识;开展输血质量管理及输血资质评审检查可有效促进医院输血质量管理的整体提升。
关键词:  医务人员  合理输血  科学输血  质量管理  输血资质
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2014.06.07
分类号:R 563.5
基金项目:广西卫生厅科研课题(编号:Z2012050)
Study on the cognitive level of scientific and reasonable blood transfusion knowledge in medical personnel
CHEN Xing-zhi,YING Jian-min,WEI Hai-chun,et al.
Department of Laboratory, Blood Center of Guangxi, Liuzhou 545005, China
Abstract:
[Abstract] Objective To explore the situation of hospital medical personnel mastering the relevant knowledge about scientific and reasonable blood transfusion as well as saving blood transfusion within their respective jurisdictions.Methods Some questionnaires designed by ourself were made for the 651 medical personnel in blood transfusion hospital for assessment before and after tutoring blood transfusion quality management and the qualification review, and did statistical analysis with the scores of the evaluation result and the accuracy of each answer.Results Before counseling blood transfusion quality management and qualification review blood transfusion in level 2 and level 3 hospital nursing staff comprehensive score was (29.56±4.47) and (30.72±4.19) respectively; The doctors was (28.87±3.98) and (31.63±3.77) respectively; After counseling in level 2 and level 3 hospital, nursing staff comprehensive score was (39.19±1.20) and (38.40±1.54) respectively; Level 2 hospital′s nursing staff improved more than level 3 hospital′s. They got higher scores after counseling. There was statistically significant difference between the two(P all <0.05). In level 2 and level 3 hospital medical personnel′s comprehensive score was enhanced obviously, and it was (38.90±2.17) and (38.71±1.35) respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). After review counseling training, in level 2 and level 3 hospital the situation of medical personnel mastering the knowledge of scientific and reasonable blood transfusion improved obviously. There was statistically significant difference between the two (P<0.05).Conclusion In level 2 and level 3 hospital, after review counseling training, the situation of medical personnel mastering the knowledge of scientific and reasonable blood transfusion improves obviously, and different levels, nurse or doctor can master more blood transfusion knowledge. To carry out the quality management of blood transfusion and transfusion qualification review inspections can promote hospital strengthening the training of scientific and reasonable transfusion related knowledge, thereby promoting the hospital medical staff overall knowledge of reasonable blood transfusion.
Key words:  Medical personnel  Reasonable blood transfusion  Science transfusion  Quality management  Transfusion qualification